Email: rosnerelena7@gmail.com
Phone:(213) 525-8821
Address: 611 N Brand Blvd, Suite 510, Glendale, CA 91203, USA
Email: rosnerelena7@gmail.com
Phone:(213) 525-8821
Address: 611 N Brand Blvd, Suite 510, Glendale, CA 91203, USA
Why did Vine shut down? Twitter announced in October 2016 that it would discontinue the app while cutting staff and costs, after building video into its main product. Commentators add weak monetization, creators leaving, and competition as contributing factors.
Twitter's announcement, as quoted in news coverage, focused on what would happen to existing Vines rather than on causes, so most explanations here come from later analysis. Each claim is marked as confirmed by contemporaneous news coverage, reported by a secondary write-up, or general understanding that Twitter has not stated itself. The dates below come from the sources reviewed, and the table notes where only one source gives a date.
|
Date |
Event |
Basis |
|
June 2012 |
Founders start the project as Vine Labs |
Reported |
|
October 2012 |
Twitter acquires Vine before launch for a reported 30 million dollars |
Reported |
|
24 January 2013 |
Public release |
Reported by one source |
|
Mid-2013 |
Peak popularity as a top free app |
Reported by one source |
|
2014 |
Two of the three founders leave |
Reported by one source |
|
June 2016 |
Beta test of a longer video feature |
Confirmed by news coverage |
|
27 October 2016 |
Twitter announces the app will be discontinued |
Confirmed by news coverage |
|
17 January 2017 |
Reported shutdown date |
Reported by one source, and another is inconsistent |
In practice, timelines for closed apps are patchy, because announcement dates are well documented while internal changes rarely are.
Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll started Vine in 2012 as a platform for six-second looping clips. Twitter bought it before public release. The price of 30 million dollars comes from secondary write-ups, not from a figure in the announcement coverage. Early acquisitions by a larger platform often bring a distribution boost, but they can also tie a product's roadmap to the parent's priorities.
Failory reports about 200 million monthly active users and over one billion loops a day at peak. The Guardian, writing at the time of the announcement, cited 100 million monthly viewers and one and a half billion daily loops, and added that user numbers had fallen in recent years. Failory frames its numbers as a peak, the Guardian's appear alongside the announcement, and neither source reconciles the two. Treat both as reported estimates, not audited data.
On 27 October 2016, Twitter said the Vine mobile app would be discontinued in the coming months. As reported by TechCrunch, the announcement itself gave no explanation of what led to the decision. The Guardian linked the decision to Twitter reducing headcount and costs. The announcement is confirmed. The cost link is the newspaper's framing.
Twitter said users could access and download their Vines, and that the website would stay online so people could keep watching. Companies that retire a product usually lead with what happens to user content, since that is what creators ask about first.
Twitter announced hundreds of layoffs earlier that day, a cut of about nine percent of its global workforce, according to NPR.
Twitter's revenue and earnings per share came in above analyst estimates, and monthly active users rose. The coverage does not reconcile this with the cost-cutting framing, and this article does not either.
Twitter had built video into its main apps and offered live video through Periscope. The Guardian read this as Twitter no longer wanting to support separate apps, which is the newspaper's reading rather than a stated Twitter position. Vine also tested a longer video feature in June 2016, so it did explore longer formats. The sources do not say what came of that test.
The explanations below come from analysts and later write-ups. No source measures how much each factor contributed, and Twitter has not ranked them.
Write-ups describe no built-in way for creators to earn from their audience, so many relied on outside sponsorships, merchandise, or fan donations. Platforms that depend on creator output tend to find that top creators move to wherever the payment path is clearer.
Failory says Vine launched no native advertising platform and earned close to nothing directly. EM360Tech refers to lower advertising revenue for Vine, which sits awkwardly with that account. The sources differ, and this article does not settle it.
The write-ups describe established creators moving to other platforms, and EM360Tech names Instagram and YouTube. As reported by CBC News, Vine had been slowly losing top creators in the year before the announcement, a point CBC attributed to Business Insider. Failory treats this gradual exit as a major reason for the closure, which is its interpretation and not a confirmed finding.
Failory points to Instagram's fifteen-second video feature and quotes a former Vine executive who described it as the start of the decline. EM360Tech dates Instagram's video launch to 2013 and says Instagram offered advertising and brand partnerships, while YouTube already had a clear route to earning. A new entrant with an existing audience can be hard for a standalone app to match, a pattern seen across consumer apps.
Twitter's own video tools overlapped with Vine, and EM360Tech says Twitter had to focus on its core platform during a period of financial difficulty and leadership change. That last point comes from a single source and stands next to the better-than-expected same-day results noted above.
Failory reports that two founders left in 2014 and the third was laid off later. It says this hints at a conflict with Twitter. That wording is cautious for good reason, since no source states why they left.
No source quantifies the weight of each cause. Twitter's statements in the coverage reviewed do not name a single reason, and the write-ups differ in emphasis, from unprofitability to creator retention to parent-company support.
The 2016 announcement said the website would stay online. A December 2024 write-up says the site, the Vine Camera app, and the archive are no longer available. Current access is not confirmed here, so check before relying on either account.
EM360Tech says compilations of well-known Vines circulate on YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram. Both write-ups name Lele Pons, Logan Paul, and Brittany Furlan as former Vine creators, and Failory describes them as active across several platforms. In practice, when an app closes, its clips tend to survive through reposts and compilations rather than an official archive, and the sources describe no single official home for Vine.
Both centre on short, creator-led video. Failory says TikTok differs by supporting varied video lengths, remix tools, live streams, donations, and advertising. EM360Tech points to a creator fund.
These are features as the sources describe them, and platform features change, so current details should be checked. Industry commentary often treats a clear creator payment path as part of what keeps top creators on a platform.
Twitter confirmed the discontinuation in October 2016, alongside layoffs and video built into its main app. Weak monetization, creator exits, competition, and parent-company priorities are commonly cited but unconfirmed. No source weighs them, and some dates and figures conflict.
Twitter announced the closure in October 2016 during cost and headcount reductions. Frequently named factors include weak monetization, creator departures, competition from Instagram, and Twitter's focus on its core product. No source ranks them.
Twitter made the announcement on 27 October 2016. Failory gives 17 January 2017 as the shutdown date, while another write-up says January 2017 and also a few months later, so the closing date is not reported consistently.
Failory reports near-zero direct revenue, while EM360Tech mentions lower advertising revenue, so accounts differ. No audited figures for Vine appear in the sources reviewed.
It is widely cited as a major factor, and a former executive quoted by Failory described it as the start of the decline. No source shows Twitter naming it as the cause.
Twitter said in 2016 the site would stay online, but a December 2024 write-up says it is no longer accessible. Compilations and reposts appear on YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram.
Start simplifying your schedule and boosting productivity with Work Schedule’s powerful tools.



